Did Microsoft Over-pay For Facebook? @ OPEN WEB DEVELOPER'S JOURNAL

Did Microsoft Over-pay For Facebook?

TIME commented: "The dotcom bubble just got bigger than ever."

Oct. 28, 2007 05:00 AM

When Microsoft parted with $240M for a 1.6% stake in a company with $140M in revenues and $30M in profits, was it over-paying? Conspiracy theorists were quick to say that the move was deliberate, to inflate the overall value of Facebook to $15BN and thereby prevent anyone else from buying it outright. TIME commented: "The dotcom bubble just got bigger than ever."

Typical of the reaction to the news last week that Microsoft was taking an equity stake in Facebook were the comments that quickly began appearing on Slashdot:

"they put Facebook's value at $15 billion to discourage others from investing in Facebook and make Facebook beholden to them.' (gbulmash)

"Absolutely correct. Not only will others potentially stay away, but it poisons Facebook themselves and creates a strong risk of complete implosion, which MS can use for leverage. Once a line is drawn in the sand, it engages the ego and creates strong psychological need to hold it, and if it starts slipping, it could exacerbate a dramatic downward spiral." (anonymous)

Darren Ginter saw a more purposive explanation. "Microsoft needs to get Silverlight out there. $240 million to Facebook is the cheapest method of getting hundreds of millions to install and use it, willingly," he opined.

Facebook is almost certain to try an IPO, which makes the Microsoft move all the more interesting. It immediately made the value of co-founder Mark Zuckerberg's stake worth $3BN, for example.

Certainly Facebook seems to be sucking users away from MySpace. But as one Slashdot commenter warned, "This feels like 1999 all over again."

Published Oct. 28, 2007 — Reads 18,993
Copyright © 2008 SYS-CON Media. All Rights Reserved.

▪ Google Snaps Up Microblogging Service Jaiku

▪ Google Gmail vs Microsoft Hotmail: "They Read Your Mail and We Don't," Says Ballmer

▪ Google Sales Surge 57% and Net Income 46% in Quarter 3

▪ Google Version 2.0: Googzilla - The Calculating Predator

▪ Facebook Valuation Hits $15BN As Microsoft Buys 1.6% Stake For $240M

▪ Facebook + BlackBerry = FaceBerry

▪ Microsoft Stock Soars As Company Reports 23% Profit Gain

▪ Apple vs Microsoft By the Numbers

About Jeremy Geelan
Jeremy Geelan is Sr. Vice-President of SYS-CON Media & Events. He is Conference Chair of the AJAXWorld Conference & Expo series, of the 3rd International Virtualization Conference & Expo and founder of Web 2.0 Journal, AJAXWorld Magazine and other major SYS-CON titles. From 2000-6, as first editorial director and then group publisher of SYS-CON Media, he was responsible for the development of all new titles and i-Technology portals for the firm, and regularly represents SYS-CON at conferences and trade shows, speaking to technology audiences both in North America and overseas. He is executive producer and presenter of "Power Panels with Jeremy Geelan" on SYS-CON.TV.

leechar wrote: It's a Silverlight play primarily. Microsoft is positioning Silverlight as the Mashup tool of choice but it needs to make it's download runtime pervasive, something similar to Flash, and this cannot take years. A growing, hot Social site like Facebook is the perfect deployment platform for distribution. Facebook is already committed to Silverlight. But it is also a move to slow down Google, that is how afraid it is of Google in the Social Web.

read & respond »

MSFT vs GOOG wrote: Google might know something about Facebook that Microsoft does not.

read & respond »

queZZtion wrote: So FB's now the fifth-most valuable internet company after Google, eBay, Yahoo and Amazon?

read & respond »

TooLitleTooLate wrote: MS panicked and overpaid, just like it panicked and overpaid when in May it bought AQuantive for $6BN.

read & respond »

LATEST OPEN WEB DEVELOPER STORIES

IBM, Microsoft & Google Eras of Computing

By Sridhar Vembu

By now it is conventional wisdom to say that there was an IBM Era of computing, then a Microsoft Era, and now we are in the Google Era. In this post, I will explain why Microsoft was not the 'next IBM' and why Google is not the 'next Microsoft' - there are significant qualitative

Enterprise Web Security Added to Google Apps

By Maureen O'Gara

Google has taken its Postini investment and turned out Google Web Security for the Enterprise, which is supposed to protect against spyware, viruses and zero-hour threats in real-time whether the user is on the corporate network or working remotely like at a hotel or in an airpor

3rd International Virtualization Conference & Expo: Themes & Topics

By Jeremy Geelan

From Application Virtualization to Xen, a round-up of the virtualization themes & topics being discussed in NYC June 23-24, 2008 by the world-class speaker faculty at the 3rd International Virtualization Conference & Expo being held by SYS-CON Events in The Roosevelt Hotel, in mi

Verizon Becomes a Counter-Android Linux Convert

By Maureen O'Gara

Verizon Wireless is snubbing Google's Linux-based Android initiative to go with the LiMo Foundation's mobile Linux spec for its next wave of mobile phones expected next year. Along with Verizon, Mozilla signed up - giving the consortium its first major open source ISV - and a key

Zoho Invites Google & Yahoo Users to Login

By Open Web Developer News Desk

Zoho announced that it is welcoming Google and Yahoo users with a unified login designed to encourage those users to try Zoho applications. Now, Google and Yahoo users who visit Zoho can simply log into Zoho using the usernames and passwords associated with their Google and Yahoo

Borland Finally Dumps CodeGear Tools Division

By Maureen O'Gara

It's only taken Borland two years but it's finally dumped its CodeGear tools division, responsible for Borland's hereditary JBuilder, Delphi and C++ Builder lines as well as its new web ventures into PHP and Ruby, said to be used by 7.5 million developers. Embarcadero Technologie